🔗 Share this article

When dawn crept over the Amazonian city of Belém on Saturday morning, delegates remained trapped in a windowless conference room, uncertain whether it was day or night. They had been 12 hours in difficult discussions, with numerous ministers representing various coalitions of countries including the most vulnerable nations to the wealthiest economies.

Patience wore thin, the air stifling as weary delegates acknowledged the grim reality: there would not be a comprehensive agreement in Brazil. The international climate negotiations faced the brink of abject failure.

The sticking point: Fossil fuels

As science has told us for well over a century, the CO2 emissions produced by burning fossil fuels is increasing temperatures on our planet to alarming levels.

Nevertheless, during over three decades of regular climate meetings, the crucial requirement to cease fossil fuel use has been referenced only once – in a decision made two years ago at previous UN climate talks to "move beyond fossil fuels". Representatives from the Middle Eastern nations, Russia, and several other countries were resolved this would not happen again.

Growing momentum for change

Simultaneously, a increasing coalition of countries were similarly resolved that movement on this issue was urgently necessary. They had developed a initiative that was gathering expanding support and made it clear they were ready to dig in.

Emerging economies urgently needed to make progress on securing economic resources to help them manage the increasingly severe impacts of extreme weather.

Critical moment

In the pre-dawn period of Saturday, some delegates were willing to withdraw and cause breakdown. "The situation was precarious for us," commented one government representative. "I considered to walk away."

The critical development occurred through negotiations with Saudi Arabia. Shortly after 6am, senior representatives split from the main group to hold a closed-door meeting with the chief Saudi negotiator. They pressed language that would subtly reference the global commitment to "transition away from fossil fuels" made two years earlier in Dubai.

Unexpected agreement

Rather than explicitly referencing fossil fuels, the text would refer to "the UAE consensus". After consideration, the Saudi delegation unforeseeably accepted the wording.

Delegates collapsed into relief. Applause rang out. The deal was done.

With what became known as the "Belém political package", the world took another small step towards the phaseout of fossil fuels – a hesitant, insufficient step that will minimally impact the climate's ongoing trajectory towards disaster. But nevertheless a important shift from absolute paralysis.

Important aspects of the agreement

• Alongside the subtle acknowledgment in the official document, countries will commence creating a roadmap to gradually eliminate fossil fuels
• This will be primarily a optional undertaking led by Brazil that will provide updates next year
• Addressing the essential decreases in greenhouse gas emissions to not exceed the 1.5C limit was also put off to next year
• Developing countries obtained a tripling to $120bn of annual finance to help them manage the impacts of extreme weather
• This funding will not be completely provided until 2035
• Workers will benefit from a "fair adjustment program" to help people working in high-carbon industries transition to the sustainable sector

Mixed reactions

While our planet approaches the brink of climate "critical thresholds" that could destroy ecosystems and force whole regions into crisis, the agreement was insufficient as the "giant leap" needed.

"The summit provided some baby steps in the correct path, but considering the scale of the climate crisis, it has not met the occasion," warned one environmental analyst.

This imperfect deal might have been the maximum achievable, given the geopolitical headwinds – including a US president who ignored the talks and remains wedded to oil and coal, the growing influence of nationalist politics, ongoing conflicts in different locations, extreme measures of inequality, and global economic uncertainty.

"Major polluters – the oil and gas companies – were at last in the spotlight at the climate summit," notes one policy convener. "There is no turning back on that. The platform is accessible. Now we must transform it into a genuine solution to a more secure planet."

Deep fissures revealed

Although nations were able to applaud the official adoption of the deal, Cop30 also exposed deep fissures in the primary worldwide framework for confronting the climate crisis.

"International summits are consensus-based, and in a period of geopolitical divides, agreement is progressively challenging to reach," stated one senior UN official. "I cannot pretend that these talks has delivered everything that is needed. The difference between present circumstances and what research requires remains dangerously wide."

Should the world is to avert the gravest consequences of climate breakdown, the UN climate talks alone will not be nearly enough.